Journal of The Egyptian Society of Nephrology and Transplantation

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 119--124

Value of acute kidney injury staging for initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients


Walid M Afifi1, Galal H Abdelnaby2, Ali M Elnabtiti3 
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Unit, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
2 Critical Care Department, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt
3 Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Walid M Afifi
44519, Zagazig University, Faculty of Medicine, Sharkia
Egypt

Background The optimal timing to start continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill ICU patients has not been accurately estimated. The proposed risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria for diagnosis of AKI may provide a method for nephrologists to decide the ‘optimal timing’ for starting dialysis. Objective Our study aimed to analyze the correlation between RIFLE stages at the start of CRRT and 90-day survival rate and to detect the effect of the timing of CRRT on poor kidney outcome in 90-day survivors. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on the data of 96 critically ill patients with AKI in ICU treated with CRRT during a 2-year period in international extended care hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from January 2015 to January 2017. Information such as age, sex, RIFLE stage, sepsis, sepsis-related organ failure assessment score, number of organ failures before CRRT, CRRT time, survival, and kidney outcome conditions at 90 days after CRRT started was collected. According to their baseline severity of AKI at the start of CRRT, the patients were assigned to three groups according to the increasing severity of RIFLE stages, group I (risk of renal dysfunction, R), group II (injury to the kidney, I), and group III (failure of kidney function, F), using RIFLE criteria. The poor kidney outcome was classified as RIFLE-L (loss of kidney function, L) or RIFLE-E (end-stage kidney disease, E) using RIFLE criteria. The correlation between RIFLE stage and 90-day survival rate was analyzed among these three groups. Additionally, the association between RIFLE stage and the poor kidney outcome (RIFLE-L+RIFLF-E) in the 90-day survivors was analyzed. Results Of the overall 96 patients, 48 survived to 90 days after the start of CRRT. There were 14, 20, and 62 patients in group I, II, and III, respectively, with corresponding 90-day survival rate of 78.5% (11/14), 60% (12/20), and 40.3% (25/62) (P<0.01, compared among groups). The percentage of the poor kidney outcome of 90-day survivors in the three groups was 18.18% (2/11), 25% (3/12), and 56% (14/25), respectively (P<0.01). After adjustment for other baseline risk factors, the relative risk for the 90-day mortality significantly increased with baseline RIFLE stage. Conclusion The RIFLE classification may be used to predict 90-day survival after starting CRRT and the poor kidney outcome of 90-day survivors in the critically ill patients with AKI treated with CRRT. Early versus late initiation of dialysis before RIFLE-F stage may be the optimal timing.


How to cite this article:
Afifi WM, Abdelnaby GH, Elnabtiti AM. Value of acute kidney injury staging for initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients.J Egypt Soc Nephrol Transplant 2017;17:119-124


How to cite this URL:
Afifi WM, Abdelnaby GH, Elnabtiti AM. Value of acute kidney injury staging for initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients. J Egypt Soc Nephrol Transplant [serial online] 2017 [cited 2018 Aug 20 ];17:119-124
Available from: http://www.jesnt.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-9165;year=2017;volume=17;issue=4;spage=119;epage=124;aulast=Afifi;type=0